9 . Const. P. 255/2025 (S.B.) Zubaida W/O Muhammad Irfan V/S Inspector General of Police (IGP) Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The law enjoins the police to get scrupulously fair to the offender along with the Magistracy is to be certain a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the regulation and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court and also from other courts However they have failed to have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The an abundance of this power casts an obligation about the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for any crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated.
Case law is specific for the jurisdiction in which it absolutely was rendered. For example, a ruling in the California appellate court would not commonly be used in deciding a case in Oklahoma.
Since the Supreme Court may be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision continues to be reached, therefore the decision in the Supreme Court needs to be taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) of the Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
This ruling has conditions, and since the petitioners unsuccessful a qualifying exam, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based about the Niazi case analogy. 9. In view of the above facts and circumstances in the case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 on the Constitution. Read more
This Court may interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer within a way inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the manner of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding achieved via the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. In case the summary or finding is for example no reasonable person would have ever attained, the Court might interfere with the summary or the finding and mould the relief to make it correct into the facts of each and every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority will be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-respect the evidence or the nature of punishment. Around the aforesaid proposition, we're fortified with the decision on the Supreme Court while in the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Read more
Because the Supreme Court could be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has been attained, therefore the decision of the Supreme Court needs for being taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) of your Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
All executive and judicial authorities throughout Pakistan are obligated to act in help of your Supreme Court, making sure the enforcement of its judgments. Because the Supreme Court may be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision is reached, the decision with the Supreme Court needs being taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) on the Constitution. Read more
168 . H.C.A 203/2016 (D.B.) Saleh Muhammad V/S Faqir Muhammad & others Sindh High Court, Karachi Matter: Appeal At times it is easy for a Judge to dismiss the suit for non-prosecution, however, a Judge is under the obligation to help make an attempt to get rid of a case on advantage and more importantly when after recording of evidence it's arrived at to some stage of final arguments, endeavors should be made for advantage disposal when it has attained these kinds of stage. Read more
, which is Latin for “stand by decided matters.” This means that a court will be bound to rule in accordance with a previously made ruling within the same sort of case.
500,000/- (Rupees 5 hundred thousand only) Every single plus the same shall be kept inside the police station into the effect that no harm shall be caused on the petitioners. five. In view of the above mentioned, this Constitutional Petition is disposed of Read more
twelve . Const. P. 245/2025 (S.B.) Qurban Ali S/o Qasim V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The regulation enjoins the police to become scrupulously fair to your offender as well as Magistracy is to be sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the legislation and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court in addition to from other courts Nonetheless they have didn't have any corrective effect on it.
These lists are sorted chronologically by Chief Justice and incorporate all notable cases decided via the court. Articles exist for almost all cases.
Where there are several members of the court deciding a case, there could possibly be one particular or more judgments provided (or reported). Only the reason for the decision of your majority can constitute a binding precedent, but all could be cited as persuasive, or their reasoning may be adopted within an argument.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming into the main case, it is also a nicely-proven proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining check here whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence inside the Stricto-Sensu, implement to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty with the charge, however, that is subject matter into the procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, for the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-respect the evidence and to reach at its independent findings over the evidence.